Tag Archives: Pastor

Replacement Ref’s and Replacement Rev’s?

There has been much rejoicing this past week. The NFL got its real referees back! If you weren’t aware, or don’t care about football (gasp!), the replacement referees were struggling terribly. There were missed calls, botched calls, and contradicting calls. None probably greater than the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back from last Monday night’s game between the Green Bay Packers and the Seattle Seahawks.

Seattle quarterback Russell Wilson scrambled from the pocket and threw to the corner of the end zone as the clock expired. Seattle receiver Golden Tate shoved Green Bay defender Sam Shields out of the way, and then wrestled with Green Bay’s M. D. Jennings for possession of the ball. It was ruled on the field as a touchdown and after a lengthy review, referee Wayne Elliott came out from under the hood and announced “the ruling on the field stands” and Seattle’s Century Link Field erupted in celebration.

However, it was utterly obvious that the pass was intercepted. NFL fans, especially those of the “cheesehead” kind, were outraged. Combined with the numerous shortcomings of the officiating crews from other games around the league, people were at wits end. “That’s not how the game is to be played!” “It’s ruing the league!” “We deserve better!” Players and coaches were unequivocal. Many “tweeted” their grievances. Many simply spoke out about them at post game conferences. Everyone wanted the “real” refs back!

Interestingly enough, only 48 hours after the botched call, it was announced that a deal had been reached and the “real” refs were put back to work. Fans were so appreciative of the referees return that before Thursday night’s game between the Baltimore Ravens and the Cleveland Browns, they stood and applauded the officials as the seven referees tipped their caps to the fans. (Also interesting is that the league wanted to make sure a solid officiating crew would work the game so they picked a veteran crew of referees with a combined 70 seasons of NFL experience.)

I find this to be utterly fascinating. People desire the real thing. And it wasn’t just the NFL players and coaches, but people across the country were weighing in. From commentators to politicians, even President Obama gave a sharp criticism of the botched call. It seems people instinctively know there is something about having the real thing, about having competent, well versed and well equipped people at the helm. At least for sports, that is.

Then again, even though I know basic CPR, and have even had to use it twice, I know that doesn’t make me a surgeon. And though I do get the mail from my mailbox every day, it doesn’t make me a mailman. And just because I can run a calculator doesn’t qualify me to prepare your taxes. It’s an interesting standard. People recognize it. They see the need for it. They want it. People value expertise. They want proficiency. They need proper service—NFL referees included.

I have written much about the value of vocations. But my point here is a bit more directed than just the affirmation of the service that various vocations provide.

Even though they were collegiate or world league referees, the replacement refs still didn’t measure up. Their ability to handle the games, know all the rules and the procedures, maintain order, and give a sense of authority was simply not there. In one case, it prompted NFL coach Bill Belichick of the New England Patriots to run out and physically grab one official to ask for clarity about another game ending uncertain call. (That was a definite “no no” on Belichick’s part. He received a $50,000 fine by the NFL for touching the referee.)

What’s my point with all of this? Since October is pastor appreciation month, I thought I might make a small observation. Over the last number of decades there has been the movement among many churches to remove and replace what has been considered an unnecessary divide between the clergy and the laity. The thought is that because the people of this world are so desperately in need of the Gospel (and yes, I absolutely agree they are!), we need to rid ourselves of just having the select few well trained, well equipped, and duly qualified people to serve as pastors and missionaries.

As a result, since all Christians know Jesus and know what it means to be a disciple of Jesus, why shouldn’t all Christians be “ministers” and “missionaries.” Subsequently, many practice that “everyone is a minister” and hold that “everyone is a missionary” After all, they say, what’s really the difference between a pastor and people?

Perhaps the NFL replacement referees helped us see the difference. The care of souls (being a pastor) is far more detailed and demanding than simply sharing the faith. I absolutely 100% agree that every Christian can and should share their faith in the midst of their various vocations. In fact, I wrote a book about it! But that does not thereby make everyone a minister (pastor) and everyone a missionary, not as they have been biblically defined, traditionally understood, and historically taught. Nor would simply knowing Jesus automatically make one qualified for the job or cause them to know the vastness and the burdens of that office.

There is intricate spiritual diagnosis and detailed care that must be tended to by pastors. Sins perpetrated and sins suffered must be lovingly and patiently fleshed out, and then brought to the cross of Christ. There are significant maladies, miseries, and misbeliefs, that need adequate, informed, and compassionate law/Gospel application. Life is complicated. Sinners are complicated. Being a pastor is complicated.

The mission of the church (and pastors) goes far beyond simply getting the message of the Gospel out. Once the Gospel message is out, there is great and profound spiritual care that needs to be administered to those who will continue to suffer from the effects of sin (you and me included). Yes, being a disciple of Jesus means freedom from sin in Christ, but not freedom from being a sinner. (At least, not this side of eternity.) Nor does it mean freedom from living under the curse of sin and the afflictions of Satan.

This is why pastors have been authorized, equipped, called, ordained, and sent—yes, to seek and save the lost—but also to shepherd God’s people, to meticulously administer law and Gospel, to give a real and raw word of hope and forgiveness, to baptize and to commune. In the words of Jesus, to “feed my sheep.”

This is not a slight against all those who desperately want others to know Jesus and to receive the forgiveness of sins. I want that too! And yes, of course, the priesthood of all believers does play a part in that. Rather, this is simply an appeal for the Holy Christian Church to recognize what the sports world so openly did this past week. Replacements for the real thing are not the real thing.

As always, this blog endeavors to thoughtfully and collegially talk about the mission of the Holy Christian Church and what it means to be authentically Lutheran, while “discipling all nations” in the 21st century. For those willing to enter the fray, I welcome your constructive thoughts and reactions.

Yours,

Rev. Woodford

Advertisements

Where Have All the Seelsorgers (Pastors) Gone?

Within the North America church, the role of pastor has morphed from the biblical and historic role of Seelsorger (one who gives care of souls) and giver of God’s gifts, to that of a CEO, administrator, and/or therapist.

Lutheran pastor and professor, Harold Senkbeil notes, “We must admit that something is missing in the life of the church as we know it. We have lost the art of the individual care of souls.  Over the generations, great treasures have been allowed to languish dust-covered and untouched in our ecclesiastical attics, while we have been busy using second-hand tools of our own devising.” (“Generation X and the Care of the Soul” in Mysteria Dei: Essays in Honor of Kurt Marquart. 2000).

It is alarming that within the North American church not only has the pastoral art for the care of souls seemingly been lost, but so has the teaching of the truth about the Gospel in and out of the worship service.

However, it is not the first time something like this has happened. In Luther’s day faithful seelsorgers were few and far between. In the preface to his Large Catechism, Luther gives a scathing criticism of the pastors of his day regarding what he perceived to be their lack of biblical knowledge and propriety for their role as pastors among a worshipping community. His assessment was bolstered by their unwillingness to learn the Catechism, let alone the Scriptures and prayers of the church, and put such learning into practice for the benefit and care of the people they served:

It is not for trivial reasons that we constantly treat the catechism and exhort and implore others to do the same, for we see that unfortunately many preachers and pastors are very negligent in doing so and thus despise both their office and this teaching…Oh these shameful gluttons and servants of their bellies are better suited to be swineherds and keepers of dogs than guardians of souls and pastors.

It would seem Luther’s criticism is warranted for any present day North American pastor, Lutheran or otherwise. In fact, echoes of his near five hundred year-old criticism can be heard today. And what is fascinating, is that those leading the criticisms over the abandonment of the church’s historic practices and pastoral care of souls are many prominent mainstream evangelicals themselves.

One notable critic is Congregationalist minister and distinguished Professor David F. Wells, who has written about the good intentions of the North American church, but still remains an ardent critic:

This new experiment in “doing church” is rooted, I am confident, in the desire, even the passion, to see the Church grow.  What has not been grasped, however, is that in the modern world, the means that are available for this task are so effective that we need very little truth in order to have success.  Marketing the faith works.  At least, it works to the extent that churches can be filled very quickly if the mix between humor, fun, friendliness, music, entertainment, and inspiration is right.  But Os Guinness is right to ask what the “decisive authority” is in each church.  The church is only the church, he says, when it lives by God’s truth, and if anything substitutes for this authority, “Christians risk living unauthorized lives of faith, exercising unauthorized ministries, and proclaiming an unauthorized gospel.” (Above All Earthly Powers: Christ in a Postmodern World, 2005, p. 307)

John MacArthur, a well known evangelical community church pastor and teacher, as well as a seminary president, sharply criticizes the church and her pastors in one of his recent books, The Truth War: “The church has grown lazy, worldly, and self-satisfied. Church leaders are obsessed with style and methodology, losing interest in the glory of God and becoming grossly apathetic about truth and sound doctrine.” (The Truth War: Fighting for Certainty in an Age of Deception, 2007, xvii.)

Eugene H. Peterson, Presbyterian scholar and pastor for over 30 years, gives a scathing indictment against pastors, reminiscent even of Luther:

American Pastors are abandoning their posts, left and right, and at an alarming rate.  They are not leaving their churches and getting other jobs. Congregations still pay their salaries.  Their names remain on the church stationary and they continue to appear in pulpits on Sundays. But they are abandoning their posts, their calling. They have gone whoring after other gods. What they do with their time under the guise of pastoral ministry hasn’t the remotest connection with what the churches pastors have done for most of twenty centuries…It is bitterly disappointing to enter a room full of people whom you have every reason to expect share the quest and commitments of pastoral work and find within ten minutes that they most definitely do not. They talk of images and statistics.  They drop names. They discuss influence and status, matters of God and the soul and Scripture are not grist for the mills.

The pastors of America have metamorphosed into a company of shopkeepers, and the shop they keep are churches. They are preoccupied with shopkeeper’s concerns—how to keep the customers happy, how to lure customers away from competitors down the street, how to package the goods so that the customers will lay out more money…The biblical fact is that there are no successful churches. There are, instead, communities of sinners, gathered before God week after week in town and villages all over the world. The Holy Spirit gathers them and does his work in them.  In these communities of sinners, one of the sinners is called pastor and given a designated responsibility in the community.  It is this responsibility that is being abandoned in spades. (Working the Angles: The Shape of Pastoral Integrity, 1987, p. 2)

William H. Willimon, a bishop in the United Methodist Church in the USA, former Dean of the Chapel at Duke University, and considered by some to be one of America’s best known preachers, also has profound insights as well as criticism for the church and her pastors to heed:

The gospel is not simply about meeting people’s needs. The gospel is also a critique of our needs, an attempt to give us needs worth having.  The Bible appears to have little interest in so many of the needs and desires that consume present-day North Americans.  Therefore, Christian pastoral care will be about much more than meeting people’s needs.  It will also be about indoctrination, inculturation, which is also—from the peculiar viewpoint of the gospel—care.  Our care must form people into the sort of people who have had their needs rearranged in light of Christ. (Pastor: The Theology and Practice of Ordained Ministry, 2002, 96.)

And the late, internationally renowned, Catholic theologian and priest, beloved professor and pastor, Henri Nouwen, offers a powerful and piercing lament:

Few ministers and priests think theologically. Most of us have been educated in a climate in which the behavioral sciences, such as psychology and sociology, so dominated the educational milieu that little true theology was being learned. Most Christian leaders today raise psychological or sociological questions even though they frame them in scriptural terms. Real theological thinking, which is thinking with the mind of Christ, is hard to find in the practice and the ministry. Without solid theological reflection, future leaders will be little more than pseudo-psychologists, pseudo-sociologists, pseudo-social workers. They will think of themselves as enablers, facilitators, role models, father or mother figures, big brothers or big sisters, and so on, and thus join the countless men and women who make a living by trying to help their fellow human beings cope with the stresses and strains of everyday life. (In the Name of Jesus: Reflections on Christian Leadership, 1989, 85-87. 

Unique to each critique is the reliance upon not only the Scriptures, but the historic practices of the church. They set out to intentionally demonstrate (some more in depth than others) how the historical heritage of the church and her pastors’ caring for souls is integral and exemplary for the contemporary care of souls, the witness of Christ, and the growth of His kingdom.

Willimon sums it up well when he says, “There is much to be said for the pastor being educated in the classic forms of Christian ministry. The Church has much experience as a minority movement. We need to draw from that experience today. In that regard, I predict a recovery of the classical shape of ministry: to teach, to preach, and to evangelize through the ministries of Word, sacrament, and order. I sense the end of a proliferation of ministerial duties and a reclamation of the essential classical tasks of Christian ministry.” (Pastor, 70-71.) May this prediction come true!

As always, I invite your collegial and constructive comments as we seek to dialogue about what it means to be a 21st century Lutheran who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth” (1 Timothy 2:4).

Yours,

Rev. Woodford